Benchmarking costs is key to accelerating improved returns for
investors acquiring water companies
An analysis of the Draft
Determinations indicates that UK water companies appear to have
been dealt a very tough hand of cards by Ofwat.
The water companies’ business plans asked for
price rises of between 0% and 27% per annum above RPI between 2010
and 2015. Ofwat has proposed increases of between -14% to 0% per
annum above RPI for the same five years. For most companies the cut
back is about a 12% swing, but for some it is as much as 32%.
With the imminent final determinations, can
water companies meet this performance challenge?
The cost of capital and impact on funding available
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital at 4.5%
for water and sewage companies and 4.9% for water only companies is
at the lower end of city analysts’ expectations. This will impact
on the returns that existing investors may receive from their
existing investment in the business. However, just as critical it
impacts on a company’s ability to raise new debt in the market or
new equity through rights issues to keep funding the massive
multi-billion pound investment programmes. These are required to
replace and maintain critical assets, as well as keeping pace with
customer needs. Any such delays in funding availability may cause
some early projects to be deferred, potentially resulting in a slow
start to the forthcoming regulatory cycle.
In facing these challenges, the critical
question for the owners and executives of any utility company is:
“Can the business successfully achieve both
efficiency savings and high performance levels that the same
Regulator is demanding?”
Working closely with a number of leading water
companies within the UK, EC Harris understands the most effective
ways in which owners and investors can balance priorities while
driving the operational efficiencies of their business.
Driving greater capital and operational efficiencies
Across the water sector we estimate that there
could be as much as a 30% difference between upper quartile and
lower quartile performance on capital delivery in the water sector
as demonstrated in the ‘£ in the Ground Analysis.’
What is the £ in the ground worth in the water sector?

When producing a comparable operating cost
benchmark of peer performance of water companies, EC Harris has
identified ways of achieving 10% reductions on general support
costs. By adopting a full solutions based approach, further
reductions of over 20% can be achieved.
Using effective models, investors can substantially
increase returns by:
- Reducing overheads: horizontally integrating
functions across separate business streams
- Reducing capital spend: optimising expenditure
through realistic Service Level Agreements, modelling
procurement
- Achieving economies of scale: reducing operating
and maintenance cost through aggregation
- Reducing waste: utilising forensic cost
assurance techniques.
The best strategy to deliver value to existing
and new investors will hinge on achieving increased efficiencies
through effective asset management.
EC Harris has developed in-depth benchmarking
data and analysis which has assisted investors in identifying the
most suitable water companies to acquire or invest in. The data
identifies where and how to deliver these elements more
efficiently, therefore minimising financial risks and achieving
financial sustainability.
Download
the 'Infrastructure investment insight' article' [132
kb]