Access Key     Description
1Home - EC Harris leading global Built Asset Consultancy, generating positive outcomes
sSite Map

Global Construction Dispute Values Fell in 2011, but More Than Doubled in the Middle East EC Harris Report Finds

  • Average value of disputes down to $32.2m, but increased to US$112m in Middle East
  • Global construction disputes took longer to resolve in 2011, up to 10.6months
  • A failure to properly administrator the contract was still the most common cause of disputes

28 May 2012

Disputes in the construction industry tended to last longer but were of lower value in 2011 according to this year’s ‘Global Construction Disputes´ report from EC Harris, the global Built Asset Consultancy.  However the report found that disputes in the Middle East were bucking the overall downward trend, with the average value of disputes increasing to US$112m from US$56.25m in 2010.

EC Harris found that construction disputes lasted 10.6 months in 2011, compared to 9.1 months in 2010.  Disputes in the US took the longest to resolve at 14.4months and were resolved the quickest in the UK at 8.7 months. 

Whilst the average value of construction disputes fell globally to US$32.2m in 2011 from US$35.1m in 2010, the UK, Europe and the Middle East saw a rise in dispute value.  Dispute values fell in Asia and the US, with the US seeing the most dramatic fall from $US64.5m in 2010 down to US$10.5m in 2011, which was due to the generally depressed construction market in the US as well as the increasing emphasis by both the public and private sector owners to avoid and mitigate disputes through risk management and early, field level, resolution of disputes. The highest value dispute handled by EC Harris during 2011 was for US$350m on a project in the Middle East.

Mike Allen, Global Head of Contract Solutions at EC Harris said: “The Middle East saw a flood of major disputes last year.  Over the past few years we have seen a reluctance to settle in the Gulf region, but this has been replaced by a stronger desire to do business and resolve disputes as the economies strengthen.  On the whole, however, disputes are still costing the industry time and money.  Focusing on avoiding the dispute from the outset through better mitigation and contract design is always the better option.”

The research, which was conducted by EC Harris’s Contract Solutions team, found that a failure to properly administer the contract was the most common cause of a construction dispute.  The top five causes of disputes in construction projects during 2011 were:

  1. A failure to properly administer the contract
  2. Ambiguities in the contract document
  3. A failure to make interim awards on extensions of time and associated compensation
  4. Incomplete design information or employer requirements
  5. Conflicting party interests

The performance of the project manager or engineer was also looked at in the report, with their conduct being at the heart of how the dispute crystallised in 52% of cases.  The most likely problem with the project manager or engineer was that they were too partial to the employer’s interests, followed by a lack of understanding of the procedural aspects of the contract.

When it came to dispute resolution, EC Harris found that arbitration had actually become less popular as a means of settlement.  Instead, party-to-party negotiation was the most common methods of resolution, followed by mediation.  Arbitration was the third most popular, with adjudication and litigation completing the top five most common methods used.

Mike Allen continued: “It is promising to see the shift for disputes to be settled without the need for formal dispute resolution, which only adds to the cost and time involved in resolving disputes through such methods.  With so many parties involved in a construction project, the need for timely, progressive and contract compliant contract administration is vital in ensuring that all current and relevant information is considered and taken into account, especially when responding to and addressing issues that arise.  This will help to reduce the likelihood of issues reaching the dispute stage.”

EC Harris’s specialist Contract Solutions team helps clients avoid, mitigate and resolve disputes.  The team is based around the globe and encompasses one of the industry’s largest pool of procurement, contract, risk management and also quantum, delay, project management, defects and building surveying experts. The Contract Solutions team provides procurement, contract and dispute avoidance and management strategies, management expertise and expert witness services. This is delivered through a blend of technical expertise, commercialism, sector insight and the use of live project data, combined with a multi disciplined and professional focus.

EC Harris: Global Constructions Disputes Report 2011

disputes 2

- ends -

For a copy of the full report, click here

Notes to editors
For further press information, please contact:

Andy Rowlands
Group PR Manager
EC Harris
T: +44 (0) 7833 6662
M: +44 (0) 7810 850 476
andy.rowlands@echarris.com

About EC Harris

EC Harris is a leading global built asset consultancy. As an ARCADIS company, we have access to approximately 21,000 professionals worldwide operating in over 70 countries, 300 offices and generating in excess of €2.4 billion in revenue. Working across a wide range of market sectors, we help our clients make the most from the money they spend on their built assets.  For more information visit http://www.echarris.com/

 


For media enquiries

Andy Rowlands
EC Harris
ECHQ
34 York Way
London
N1 9AB
United Kingdom

t +44 (0)20 7833 6662
m +44 (0)7810 850476


   Contact Andy Rowlands

Fields marked with an * are mandatory.